What is Dr.Ifergane's finding about the human element? -考呗网题库移动版
英语六级
首页 题库首页在线模考
取消

A.Medical staff gave priority to accompanied patients.
B.Patients received clot-busting quicker because of company.
C.Two companies may maximally reduce the "time to CT".
D.Companies can partially replace the work of clinical staff.

参考答案C
解析:
定位:根据题干中的Dr.Ifergane和human element定位到第三段第二句:Gal Hergane…noticed that stroke patients who were accompanied to the ER by mends or family seemed to fare better than those who arrived alone.和第四段最后一句:A second companion shaved a further 20 minutes off the wait,alough three or more companions did not confer any additional benefit.
详解:推理判断题。第一个定位旬首先明确了所谓人为因素对于伊孚格恩医生而言是指就医的陪 同,而第二个定位句指出两名陪同比一名陪同能再缩短20分钟等待就医的时间,而更多的陪同就不会 带来进一步的优势。可见,两名陪同的优势是最大的,故答案为C.。A.“医务人员给予有陪同的病人 一些优先权”,在第五段中作者指出陪同可能帮助引起医务人员的注意,但这不能说明医务人员给予其 优先权,故排除;B.“由于有人陪同,病人能更快地接受血栓崩解治疗”,第四段第三句虽提到有人陪同 的病人能更快地接受治疗,但又补充说道,由于样本太少,不能确定提早治疗的原因是否在于有人陪同, 故该项可以排除;D.“陪同人员可部分替代医务人员的工作”,第五段最后一句虽然提到陪同人员参与 了一些基本的护理工作,但并没有说可以部分替代医务人员,故排除。

你可能喜欢

A.clinical staff should record identities of the companies
B.companies should be encouraged to provide basic care
C.changes should be made to operations of medical institutions
D.clinics should ensure stroke patients have appropriate company

A.It has some significant implications.
B.It will start the key reform of clinics.
C.It means little to clinics outside Israel.

D.Its validity should be questioned.

延伸阅读