Questions are based on the following passage. Is It Worth Eating an-考呗网题库移动版
英语六级
首页 题库首页在线模考
取消
单选题Questions are based on the following passage.
Is It Worth Eating an Organic Diet?
[A] Sales of organic food have been rising steadily over the past decade, reaching almost $30billion in 2011, or 4.2% of all U.S. food and beverage (饮料) sales, according to the OrganicTrade Association. Many of the consumers who purchase these products say paying morefor organic produce, milk and meat is a trade-off(权衡) they are willing to make in order toavoid exposure to chemical pesticides and fertilizers and milk from cows given bovine growthhormone (牛生长激素). Some experts say common sense should tell us that food grownwithout the help of synthetic chemicals is probably safer and healthier to consume than foodcontaining those substances, even in trace amounts. They believe Americans should try tosubstitute organic products for conventional ones whenever possible.
[B] However, other families, especially those whose food budgets may be more limited wonder iforganic food is really worth its hefty (异常大的) price tag. Other experts point out that thereisn't enough scientific evidence to say for sure that eating organic food leads to better health.As such, they say the most important dietary advice they can give Americans is to eat morefresh fruit and vegetables and less processed food.
[C] Alex Leo, associate professor of environmental exposure biology at the Harvard School of PublicHealth, argues for eating more organic food. Janet H. Silverstein, a professor of endocrinology (内分泌学) at the University of Florida and a co-author of an American Association of Pediatrics (儿科学) study on the health benefits of an organic diet, takes the skeptic's (怀疑者的) view. So far,researchers haven't been able to provide them with a definitive answer.
[D] Is there definitive scientific proof that an organic diet is healthier? "Not yet," said Leo. Robustscientific studies comparing food grown organically and food grown conventionally don'texist, thanks to a lack of funding for this kind of research. "The lack of definitive evidencecombined with the higher price of organic food has given skeptics a golden opportunity toargue that organic isn't worth the cost and effort," he added.
[E] While studies in recent years have delivered a decidedly mixed message about thehealthfulness of organic food, those on both sides of the debate generally agree that organicproduce typically contains fewer pesticides than conventional produce, and that people maybe able to reduce or eliminate agricultural chemicals from their bodies by adopting an organicdiet. This was illustrated in a study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectivesin 2006. That study, which was led by Leo, showed that within five days of substituting mostlyorganic produce for conventional produce in children's diets, pesticides disappeared from thechildren's urine ( 尿液).
[F] Many say the pesticides found in our food are nothing to fear because the levels fall well belowfederal safety guidelines and thus aren't dangerous. Similarly, they say the bovine growthhormone used to increase cows' milk yield is perfectly safe. But federal guidelines don't take intoaccount what effect repeated exposure to low levels of chemicals might have on humans overtime. And many pesticides were eventually banned or restricted by the federal government afteryears of use when they were discovered to be harmful to the environment or human health.
[G] Pesticides, in particular, are made to kill organisms, and the President's Cancer Panel in 2010made clear that it sees them as a threat, advising Americans to "reduce their cancer risks bychoosing, to the extent possible, food grown without pesticides or chemical fertilizers."
[H] Recent field studies showed that organic produce, such as strawberries, leafy vegetables andwheat, not only tastes better but contains much higher levels of phenolic acids (酚酸) thanconventional produce. Phenolic acids can prevent cellular damage, and offer some protectionagainst oxidative stress ( 氧化应激), inflammation (炎症) and cancer.
[I] Yes, organic food typically costs more and can be harder to find than traditional food, but onecould argue that the price of conventional food is artificially low because of all the subsidiesthat organic farmers don't get and that the government could do more to help organic farmerslower their costs. Nevertheless, when bought in season, organic produce is often comparable inprice to conventional produce.
[J] A good strategy for consumers on limited budgets is to buy the organic versions of foods on theEnvironmental Working Group's "Dirty Dozen" list, as they typically contain the most pesticides.Or, consumers could focus on buying the organic versions of the foods they eat most. Knowingthat we could reduce our exposure to pesticides and increase our exposure to antioxidants ( 抗氧化剂 ) by eating organic food, it makes great common sense to consume more of it.
[K] Organic food is more expensive than conventional offerings, which could make it costprohibitive for families on limited food budgets. Given the lack of data showing that organicfood leads to better health, it would be counterproductive to encourage people to adopt anorganic diet if they end up buying less produce as a result. If families can afford to buyorganic and still put a good amount of healthy food on the table, then the decision aboutwhether to spend the extra money on organic produce, milk and meat should be based on asolid understanding of what we do and don't know about the benefits.
[L] It is difficult to compare the nutritional value of organic versus conventional food because thesoil, climate, timing of harvest, and storage conditions all affect the composition of produce.Still, published studies have found no significant differences in nutritional quality betweenorganic and nonorganic produce or milk. Similarly, there is no evidence that giving bovinegrowth hormone (BGH. to cows changes the composition of milk or affects human health.BGH is inactive in humans and degrades in the acidic environment of the stomach. As forpesticide exposure, the U.S. in 1996 established maximum permissible levels for pesticideresidues (残留) in food to ensure food safety. Many studies have shown that pesticides levels in conventional produce fall well below those guidelines.
[M] While it's true that organic fruits and vegetables in general contain fewer traces of these chemicals,we can't draw conclusions about what that means for health as there haven't been any long-termstudies comparing the relationship between exposure to pesticides from organic versus nonorganicfoods and adverse health outcomes. It may seem like "common sense" to reduce exposure to thesechemicals, but there are currently no good evidence-based studies to answer the question.
[N] While awaiting definitive studies, families on limited budgets who are concerned aboutpesticide exposure can refer to the Environmental Working Group's list of the "Dirty Dozen,"those foods with the highest pesticide residues, and the "Clean 15", the foods with the lowestpesticide concentrations. A good strategy would be to focus on buying organic versions of thefoods on the "Dirty Dozen" listing.
[O] We would like to think that organic food is grown locally, put in a wheelbarrow (独轮手推车) and brought directly to our homes. However, much of it comes from countries whereregulations might not be as tightly enforced as in the U.S., and labeling of the foods mightbe misleading. And just because food is labeled organic doesn't mean it is completely free ofpesticides. Contamination can occur from soil and ground water containing previously usedchemicals, or during transport, processing and storage. Organochlorine insecticides (有机氯杀虫剂) were recently found in organically grown root crops and tomatoes even though thesepesticides haven't been used for 20 years.
Food marked organic may contain pesticides as well.

参考答案O
解析:本文主要分析了有机食品是否值得购买。[A]~[C]段指出关于有机食品一直存在争议,至今也没有证据表明食用有机食品更健康。[D]~[H]段指出有机食品中的杀虫剂残留量确实比传统食品少。[I]~[O]段指出,如果预算有限,不鼓励消费者食用有机食品;而且无法证明有机食品比传统食品更有营养;提醒消费者不要轻信标签。
食用有机产品值得吗?
[A]美国有机贸易协会统计,过去的十年间,有机食品的销售量一直都在稳步上升,其销售额在2011年达 到近300亿美元,占全美食品和饮品销售量的4.2%。许多购买有机食品的消费者认为为避免接触到化 学杀虫剂和化肥,为避免喝到吃牛生长激素的奶牛产出的牛奶,他们愿意为有机农产品、有机牛奶和有 机肉类多花点钱。[42]一些专家称,常识告诉我们未添加人工合成化学物质的食品要比添加了这些化学 物质的食品(哪怕是微量的)食用起来更安全、更健康一他们认为,只要有可能,美国人都应该试着用 有机产品替代传统产品。
[B]不过,其他家庭,尤其是那些食品预算可能更为有限的家庭,怀疑有机食品是否真的值那么昂贵的价  格一其他专家指出,没有足够的科学证据证明,食用有机食品一定会使人更加健康[44]鉴于此,他们  说他们能给美国人的最重要的饮食建议就是:多吃新鲜的水果和蔬菜,少吃加工食品。
[C][45]哈佛大学公共卫生学院环境暴露生物学副教授亚历克斯·利奥认为应该多吃有机食品?佛罗里达 州立大学内分泌学教授珍妮特·H.西尔弗斯坦对此持质疑态度,她也是美国儿科学会所做的一项关于 有机饮食对健康的益处的研究的合著者。迄今为止,研究人员还不能给出一个明确的答复
[D]有确凿的科学证据表明有机饮食更健康吗?利奥说:“还没有。”由于缺乏研究经费,目前还没有将有机 生长的食物和以传统方式生长的食物进行比较的坚实可信的科学研究.利奥还指出:“由于没有确凿的 证据,再加上有机食品的价格偏高,这些给了怀疑论者一个绝佳的机会,质疑为有机食品付出的金钱和 精力并非物有所值。”
[E]尽管近年来的研究就有机食品是否健康给出的答复含糊不清,[40]但争论的双方大体上都认同有机农 产品所含的杀虫剂通常要比传统农产品少些,而且食用有机食品可能会减少或清除人们体内的农用化学物质。上述观点在2006年发表在《环境与健康展望》杂志上的一则研究中有所阐述。由利奥带头进 行的该项研究表明,在5天的时间里将儿童饮食中的大部分传统农产品替换成有机食品,儿童尿液中 的杀虫剂就消失了。
[F]许多人觉得无须担心食物中的杀虫剂,因为它们的含量远远低于联邦安全指导标准,所以并不危险:同  样的,这些人认为,那些用在奶牛身上为增加牛奶产量的牛生长激素也十分安全。[41]但是,联邦指导  标准却并未考虑反复接触微量的化学物质,久而久之会对人们产生怎样的影响。而且许多杀虫荆在使  用多年以后才被发现对环境或人类健康有危害,最终被联邦政府禁用或限制使用
[G] 2010年,美国总统癌症研究小组曾明确表示将杀虫剂,特别是为了杀死生物而研制出来的杀虫剂,视 为一种威胁,建议美国人“为降低患癌症的风险,应尽量选择那些在生长过程中没有使用过杀虫剂或化 学肥料的食物”。
[H]最近的实地研究表明,与传统农产品相比,有机农产品,如草莓、叶菜和小麦等,不仅口感更好,而且 富含更多的酚酸。酚酸能够防止细胞受损,并对预防氧化应激、炎症和癌症等有一定的保护作用、
[I]是的,与传统食品相比,有机食品一般更贵,也更难买到?但也可以这样说,传统食物的价格是被人为 地压低了,因为种植有机食物的农民得不到补贴,政府在帮助种植有机食物的农民降低成本方面能做 更多的事情。[43]然而,如果当季购买的话,有机农产品在价格上常常与传统农产品不相上下.
[J]对于食品预算有限的消费者来说,购买环境工作组“12种受污食品”清单上所对应的有机产品则是个 上策,因为这些食品一般附着的杀虫剂最多:或者,消费者可以重点采购与自己最常吃的食物相对应的 有机产品。了解到我们能通过食用有机食品来减少接触杀虫剂,并增加对抗氧化剂的接触,多吃有机食 品就非常合情合理了。
[K]有机食品较之传统食品价格更高,这就足以让那些食物预算有限的家庭望而却步。[39]考虑到没有证据 表明食用有机食品能使人们更健康,如果鼓励人们吃有机食物,从而导致他们最终购买的食物比原来 少了,那可能就会适得其反。如果家庭能够买得起有机食品,而且端上餐桌的健康食物分量仍然足够的 话,那么,是否决定多花钱购买有机农产品、有机牛奶和有机肉类应取决于人们是否对有机食品的益处 有可靠的了解。
[L] [38]很难把有机食品和传统食品的营养价值进行比较,因为土壤、气候、收割时间以及存储条件都会影响 农产品的成分.况且,已发表的研究没有发现有机和无机农产品或牛奶在营养品质上有显著不同。同样, 也没有证据表明,让奶牛吃牛生长激素会改变牛奶的成分,或者影响人类的健康牛生长激素在人体内并 不活跃,而且它会在胃的酸性环境中分解。至于接触杀虫剂,1996年美国就已设定了食品中杀虫剂残留量 的最大限值。以确保食品安全.许多研究表明,传统农产品中的杀虫剂含量远远低于那些指导标准。
[M]从总体上说,虽然有机水果和蔬菜中确实含有较少的化学物质,但我们不能就此得出结论说这对健康意味 着什么,因为并没有长期的研究对接触有机、非有机食品中的杀虫剂与不良的健康结果两者之间的关系进 行比较。要少接触化学物质,这看起来是个常识,但目前的研究因缺少确凿证据而无法解释这个问题二。
[N] [37]在确凿的研究还没有出台之前,那些担心接触杀虫剂而预算又有限的家庭可参考环境工作组列出 的“12种受污染食品清单(该清单中的食品中杀虫剂残留量最多)”和“15种洁净食品(该清单中的 食品含的杀虫剂浓度则最低)”:重点购买“12种受污染食品”清单所列食物对应的有机产品是上策二。
[O]我们会认为有机食品都是在本地生长,被放在独轮手推车中直接送到我们家中的一然而,多数有机食品产自那些执法严格程度也许还不如美国的国家,食物包装上的标签可能会误导人们。[36]而且,贴有“有机”字样的食品并不意味着完全不合杀虫剂。之前用过化学物质的土壤和地下水也会污染食物,或在运输途中、加工过程中和贮存期间食品也会受到污染。最近在有机种植的根茎类作物和西红柿中发现了有机氯杀虫剂,尽管人们已经有20年不用这种杀虫剂了。
【定位】根据题目中的food,organic和pesticides可将本题出处定位于[O]段第3句。
【解析】[O]。[O]段第3句提到,贴有“有机”字样的食品并不意味着完全不合杀虫剂。接下来的几句进  一步说明,食品可能会因为其土壤或水源曾经使用过杀虫剂而被污染,或在运输途中被污染。题目是对  [O]段第3句的同义转述。

你可能喜欢

延伸阅读