Why it taken so long for the UK government to consider plain packaging-考呗网题库移动版

单选题Why it taken so long for the UK government to consider plain packaging?

A．Prime Minister Cameron has been reluctant to take action.
B．There is strong opposition from veteran nicotine addicts.
C．Many Members of Parliament are addicted to smoking.
D．Pressure from tobacco manufacturers remains strong.

参考答案A

解析:[A] Prime Minister Cameron has been reluctant to take action.

点击查看答案进入在线模考

你可能喜欢

单选题What did Cameron say about chocolate oranges at supermarket checkouts?

A．They fueled a lot of controversy.
B．They made more British people obese.
C．They attracted a lot of smokers.
D．They had certain ingredients missing.

点击查看答案进入在线模考

单选题Passage Two
Questions 51 to 55 are based on the following passage.
What a waste of money!In return for an averageof£44,000 of debt,students get an average of only 14 hours of lecture and tutorial time a week in Britain. Annual fees have risen from£1,000 to $9,000 in the last decade. But contact time at university has barely risen at all. And graduating doesn’t even provide any guarantee of a decent job:sixin ten graduates today are in non-graduate jobs.

No wonder it has become fashionable to denounce many universities as little more that elaboratecom-tricks(骗术.. There’s a lotfor students to complain about the repayment threshold for paying back loans will be frozen for five years, meaning that lower-paid graduals have to start repaying their loans, and maintenance grants have been replaced by loans meaning that students from poorer backgrounds face higher debt than those with wealthier parents.

Yet it still pays to go to university. If going to university doesn’t work out, students pay very little—if any—of their tuition fees back, you only start repaying when you are earning £21, 000 a year. Almost half of graduates—those who go on to earn less—will have a portion of their debt written off. It’s not just the lectures and tutorials that are important. Education is the sum of what students teach each other in between lectures and seminars. Students do not merely benefit while at university, studies show they go on to be healthier and happier than non-graduates, and also far more likely to vote.

Whatever your talents, it is extraordinarily difficult to get a leading job in most fields without having been to university. Recruiters circle elite universities like vulturous(兀鹰.. Many top firms will not even look at applications from those who lack a 2.1, i.e., an upper-second class degree, from an elite university. Students at university also meet those likely to be in leading jobs in the future, forming contacts for life. This might not be right, but school-leavers who fail to acknowledge as much risk making the wrong decision about going to university.

Perhaps the reason why so many universities offer their students so little is they know studying at a top university remains a brilliant investment even if you don’t learn anything .Studying at university will only become less attractive if employers shift their focus away from where someone went to university—and there is no sign of that happening anytime soon. School-leavers may moan, but they have little choice but to embrace university and the student debt that comes with it.
What is the author’s opinion of going to university?

A．It is worthwhile after all.
B．It is simply a waste of time.
C．It is hard to say whether it is good or bad.
D．It is too expensive for most young people.

点击查看答案进入在线模考

单选题What does the author say about the employment situation of British university graduates?

A．Few of them are satisfied with the jobs they are offered.
B．It usually takes a long time for them to find a decent job.
C．Graduates from elite universities usually can get decent jobs.
D．Most of them take jobs which don’t require a college degree.

点击查看答案进入在线模考

hot热门搜索

你可能喜欢

延伸阅读